|
Post by KyleW95 on Feb 13, 2024 14:38:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by blythkd on Feb 13, 2024 19:05:51 GMT -5
Nice work!
|
|
|
Post by pioneer1200a on Feb 14, 2024 9:09:07 GMT -5
That is a cool saw! Well Done!
|
|
|
Post by xl130 on Feb 14, 2024 18:26:38 GMT -5
Great work. Nice saw!
|
|
|
Post by onlyhomelites on Feb 14, 2024 23:18:42 GMT -5
Very nice!
|
|
boots
Collector wannabe
Posts: 17
|
Post by boots on Mar 9, 2024 4:46:07 GMT -5
Very nice.
|
|
|
Post by footstep on Mar 10, 2024 14:37:04 GMT -5
Is that an old's sitting behind it?
|
|
|
Post by KyleW95 on Mar 11, 2024 9:08:25 GMT -5
Is that an old's sitting behind it? It has an olds engine! But the body is a 1969 Buick skylark. Engine is a Slightly modified Olds 455 bored to a 461.
|
|
|
Post by edju1958 on Mar 11, 2024 10:12:12 GMT -5
Thinking about your clutch dilemma.Would a 6 shoe clutch for a SXL-925 work?I don't know the diameters of the cranks,but if they're the same it may be worth a try.
|
|
|
Post by KyleW95 on Mar 11, 2024 12:24:39 GMT -5
I tried that, but i'm trying to remember why it didn't work.. Ill have to look again. I know one difference is the 925 clutch is thinner, so id need to use a 925 drum. I got tied up with other projects and this one got set in the "kinda finished" area.
|
|