Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2018 0:41:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sweepleader on Jan 17, 2018 8:16:49 GMT -5
Pretty rough, but cheap.
Anyone know what that engine is? Looks like a much later (than 1952) Chev Big Block.
|
|
|
Post by sawnami on Jan 17, 2018 9:15:21 GMT -5
Must be an engine retrofit. Too early for a Tonawanda big block and alternator.
|
|
|
Post by sweepleader on Jan 17, 2018 10:03:22 GMT -5
You think it is a late engine too? I don't know what Seagrave used for chassis/engine. I also don't know of any other engines that had rocker covers, water pump, and distributor that looked that much like the Big Block, but there certainly could have been.
|
|
|
Post by undee70ss on Jan 17, 2018 10:28:23 GMT -5
Looks like a 366 Chevy big block truck engine
|
|
|
Post by stillsawing on Jan 17, 2018 19:31:21 GMT -5
It's definitely a GM big block. And not the 409. Could have been built on a IH chassis, or Mack, or Reo, or Diamond, many choices when fire bodies were built for order. And engine choices were optional also. That big block was not manufactured in 1952. My guess would be a large 6 cylinder would have been OME.
|
|
|
Post by Clasec on Jan 17, 2018 20:51:13 GMT -5
I like the hole in the grille for a hand crank starter. I'd like to see a guy crank up that Mark IV big block by hand.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2018 21:07:37 GMT -5
I like the hole in the grille for a hand crank starter. I'd like to see a guy crank up that Mark IV big block by hand. Of course there would be nothing for the crank handle to meet on the late model big block, still cranking a big six would also prove very formidable.
|
|