|
Post by tommyhnavix on Jun 16, 2012 16:55:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sweepleader on May 30, 2013 12:10:06 GMT -5
Several of these discussions mention the problems of connecting the engine to the power absorber with chains and belts causing losses and ratios that are difficult to account for. If the engine is mounted on a bracket that pivots on the crankshaft center-line and is restrained from rotating by a load cell the connection to the absorber becomes irrelevant to the power calculation. You measure the speed and torque at the engine as adjusted by the throttle and load absorber settings and forget the losses in the drive system. I did some research on this issue years ago with hot rods in mind. Most dynos are set up for easy engine mounting but a small chainsaw motor would allow for some odd brackets that a Chev V8 would not.
If the absorber were shaft driven with a coupling the fit over the engine drive sprocket similar to that used in the winch situation mounting would be greatly simplified. Now just gotta go build it, eh?
|
|